The woman in peril is of course Richard Kimble’s (Harrison Ford) wife, who he has been accused of murdering. However, the movie established his innocence from the very first time we see the character. First of all, he is wearing black pants (and later we also see a black suit), different from those the attacker had on the black and white footage. Second, the attacker did not have a beard in the footage. But besides these elements in the story, the director Andrew Davis also uses elements of mise-en-scene to make us believe Kimble’s innocence. The first time we see the character, the camera proxemics come to a very personal level. We can see the pain in Kimble and we immediately feel empathy towards the character.
Later, as Kimble is interrogated, the framing remains at a close and personal level. We continue to feel sympathetic towards his character. The flashbacks to earlier in the night all but confirm his innocence towards us the audience. However, they also let us know that his character’s fate is sealed. In the trial, we get more flashes to the scene of the murder. These flashes now seem to represent the point of view of the prosecution, not of Kimble’s memories. The color values change for the flashes, this time they have a blue filter and not black and white, as if this time they are an interpretation of the facts and not a memory like before. It is clear that director Andrew Davis used many elements of mise-en-scene in the opening of the film to not only show the innocence of Richard Kimble, but to show his ultimate fate.
Whom he has been accused of murdering. You have some good ideas about lighting, and you do a good job oxf other miss en scene elements.
ReplyDelete